Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Virgin Atlantic to finally launch Seoul flights in 2026

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Two years ago (March 2023 to be precise) Virgin Atlantic gave a binding agreement to the UK Competition & Markets Authority to launch flights to Seoul. This was part of a deal to allow UK Government approval of the Korean Air and Asiana merger.

At the time we wrote that “Flights are expected to launch during the Summer 2024 flying season which starts in late March 2024.”

They didn’t, although this was due to the Korean / Asiana merger not completing until December 2024.

However, the official announcement has now been made. Flights to Seoul will begin on 29th March 2026, three years after Virgin Atlantic agreed to do so.

Virgin Atlantic Korean

With British Airways not having flown to Seoul for a number of years, the prospect of the only two airlines offering direct services merging caused concern in the UK.

As well as fears that the 150,000 passengers who flew between London and Seoul annually pre-covid could face higher fares for direct flights, there was also concern that cargo pricing could increase and raise costs for British businesses who rely on Korean imports.

Korean Air entered into a series of undertakings across both its passenger and cargo businesses to ease these concerns.

What will the deal involve?

Korean Air has provided Virgin Atlantic with slots at London Heathrow and Seoul Incheon to operate this service. From this point of view, it’s a low risk investment by Virgin Atlantic.

What is odd is that Virgin Atlantic and Korean Air will codeshare on the flights. Virgin Atlantic is already codesharing with Korean Air on its existing Heathrow services.

And, of course, both Virgin Atlantic and Korean Air are members of the SkyTeam airline alliance, allowing passengers to earn and spend frequent flyer miles on each others services.

You may therefore wonder what ‘competition’ this new service will provide ….

There’s more upside for Virgin Atlantic. It must operate the route for at least three years, albeit this is subject to ‘commercial viability’. After three years, Virgin Atlantic is allowed to use the Heathrow slots it received from Korean for a different route, although it cannot sell or lease them to another airline.

Virgin Atlantic agrees to launch Seoul

Given the cost of Heathrow slot pairs, Virgin Atlantic could happily sustain losses for three years if it meant inheriting the slots in perpetuity. Whilst, admittedly, it cannot sell these particular slots, it could move another flight into them and sell the OTHER slots it vacated.

Will the route be a success? The fact that Virgin Atlantic is putting a Boeing 787-9 onto it, with the old ‘coffin’ seat, means that it will face an uphill struggle to generate business class revenue.

When will services operate?

Flights will start on 29th March 2026.

Services will operate daily using a Boeing 787-9.

The outbound flight leaves London Heathrow T3 at 09.45, arriving at Seoul Incheon at 06.05 the following day.

The return flight leaves Seoul Incheon at 08.35, landing at 15.05.

Virgin Atlantic has agreed a codeshare agreement with Korean Air to connect to 14 cities. These are Busan, Osaka, Nagoya, Tokyo, Fukuoka, Okinawa, Hokkaido, Sydney, Brisbane, Auckland, Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, Da Nang and Hong Kong.

You cannot book today. Tickets, for cash or Virgin Points, will be available from 14th May.

Comments (65)

  • BJ says:

    Schedule is potentially horrendous. It would be ok for me as I sleep easily and long on aircraft but for the many who cannot or will not the times are tough. Reward flights under the new rules will likely be something stupid in UC even in combination with a voucher so even connecting flights with partners will likely make more sense in terms of both price and schedule. What was once an exciting prospective UC reward opportunity is now quite the opposite

    • The Streets says:

      I flew back economy Seoul to London a couple of days ago with Korean Air with a similar departure time .. you can get very hungry on a 13 hour day flight! The aircraft used was a lot older than the Korean Air flight I took a few days before that from Hong Kong to Seoul but the points and taxes were super cheap so can’t complain

      • BJ says:

        If people are happy with Y or even premium Y it is lijely a great result. I’ve only did one longhaul Y flight in the last 30 years and that was Etihad EDI-AUH-BKK one way so doesn’t really count. Before that I used to get very uncomfortable in Y after around 8-9h so 13-15h is difficult for me to imagine. I used most of my Virgin miles on one way BKK-EDI in KLM but may vontemplated cancelling that if it gets me 2x premium Y seats on Virgin back to UK from Seoul next April. Longhaul premium Y would also be a newcexperience for me but my partner has done so on AF and said it was fine for daytime flights.

      • Aston100 says:

        I flew Seoul to London with Asiana on an a350.
        We received three meals during the 13.5 hours flight.
        I guess Asiana must have been a better airline than Korean?

        • The Streets says:

          Depends if you count a corn dog as a meal! The other two meals were good quality. The business configuration of 232 wouldn’t have been good value so was content with my bulk head seat even if the IFT felt like it was dated from the year 2000

  • Claire f says:

    Great news. Is it going to be year round? Now the big question how many points?

    • BJ says:

      X000,000 each way in UC unless Virgin cuts us some slack to get it started. Year-round until Virgin scraps it for one reason or another.

  • BBbetter says:

    The unwritten part is that Korean Air would’ve paid some money to convince VS to fly this route? Therefore VS can get away with a 787 coffin seat and lower revenue?

    • Rob says:

      Yes, it is possible – as part of the codeshare – that Korean has promised to buy a large number of seats per flight, enough to underwrite break even costs.

    • Rhys says:

      No, I believe no money changed hands.

      • LittleNick says:

        I like how we have contradicting answers from Rob/Rhys here lol

        • Rob says:

          Using codeshare deals to quietly subsidise new routes (by having the codeshare partner guarantee a minimum level of seat sales) is common. Why do you think Finnair launched Doha flights from 3 different cities?

  • astra19 says:

    Flight times aren’t great for connecting in either direction, which is a shame.

    • Steve says:

      From my yearly trips to Korea I observed that these flights are for the Korean tourists. Come to London for a few days. Then a little bit of Europe and go home. For this the times are perfect.

  • Nico says:

    Given the code share it is not real competition, as pointed out, so all really weird

  • Gerry Howe says:

    Was very interested in this route until the 787-9 appeared. Just hate those awful coffin seats.

    • CorkGirl says:

      Same. Last time I went was from BHX with Qatar and it was obviously long, but great. I was looking forward to VS until they did their usual of throwing the 787 on the new route. I am small so don’t find the seats very tight and like them for sleeping, but don’t find them very comfortable for long day flights and the IFE etc is so dated. Exactly the setup I *wouldn’t* choose for their longest flight. Would rather fly Korean or go indirect from BHX (e.g. KLM also fly there, and seem to use their renovated 777 with suites in J)

      • Throwawayname says:

        I’d say that going from Birmingham to LHR with luggage is easier by plane via AMS than by train via Euston and Tottenham Court Road.

        • GM says:

          I’ve decided my next Toronto trip is KLM via AMS rather than the drive to LHR and VS, despite them having some good prices. Still Sky Team but easier than trekking down. Train would be a complete pain!

  • Budva says:

    I went to Seoul last month with AY. As a tourism destination I wonder if there is much demand. Would be very niche. Business destination maybe. Interested to know what the business case is from UK. Lots of US and Japanese visitors there though

    • Rhys says:

      Korean culture has been on a massive rise in the U.K. over the past four years. Look at the Kpop idols now playing to huge crowds. Squid Game. Etc etc.

      • Budva says:

        Not sure that demographic is willing to fly 13 hours though!

        • Novice says:

          Some fans go just to hit up kpop spots. I toured SK last April. Tour guide was saying that they are very busy.

        • Panda Mick says:

          IIRC, some of the people that did the SAS challenge were from Korea (and were subject to some long flights as part of that), so not sure your comment holds water

        • r* says:

          Kpop fans are nuts so 13 hour flights are probably nothing, theyll buy multiple copies of songs just so theyre higher in the charts, its bizarre lol.

          Coffin seats and no doubt awful points redemption prices will probably nope this one away tho.

          • Novice says:

            I’m not a kpop fan but do like kdramas. But you are right. Kpop fans are on another level. That’s why there is so much pressure on the idols as fans want to control everything including their personal lives.

      • GM says:

        Agree. Went in October 2023 with friends and we weren’t even into K Pop etc. I’d watched a couple of K dramas. We loved it. Stocked up on cosmetics, got some treatments, did the tourist stuff. It’s a huge destination now. Even my mother wants to go after watching Squid Game. We want to return and also see Busan, Jeju etc. Great place.

    • The Streets says:

      I’ve been a handful of times now and absolutely love it. The city has so much going for it but the minimal English information and hardly anyone speaking anything but Korean means you need google translate everywhere you go

      • Nico says:

        Been twice and loved it, especialy Busan, could become very popular, guess some marketing is needed. Also it is surprisingly very affordable.

      • Novice says:

        They are nice ppl tho. When my tour finished, I went to Busan and Incheon as those cities weren’t part of the tour and everyone was really helpful as I was pretty clueless about things.

    • John G says:

      The tourism boom you are seeing in Japan now will be replicated in Korea before long. There is so much to see there outside Seoul.

    • JDB says:

      It’s maybe considered niche because it’s not one of the ‘classic’ destinations and is all the better for that. Korea is a wonderful country for its sights, hospitality and food but also to observe (like China) the remarkable advance of cultural creativity and technology. I first went there when Busan was still Pusan and Jeju island was Cheju which dates it/me a bit! DMZ visits were probably a bit easier in those days and quite an eye opener.

    • Panda Mick says:

      It opens up Japan again with VS. I flew to Seoul via Tokyo a few years ago with VS / Korean Air, for example

    • Michael Jennings says:

      I had a great time when I went to Seoul about 15 years ago. It’s a fascinating and dynamic place and I loved it. I can see myself using these flights, depending on prices etc.

  • RC says:

    As others have said, horrific flight times. Morning departures to Asia are brutal for jet lag . Worst is a 6am arrival in SK so need a hotel booked from day before to check/in, shower, sleep a bit more.
    I give this route 12 months maximum before Virgin give up.

    • G says:

      VS needs to operate it for 3 years as per the merger; I don’t see it lasting beyond 3 years though

      • Rob says:

        3 years ‘subject to commercial viability’. It seems they could kill it earlier if it didn’t make money, although whether the slots vest if its run for under 3 years is a different question.

        • Michael Jennings says:

          This does have the feel of route that is going to be flown for exactly three years, doesn’t it?

        • JDB says:

          The slots don’t vest but become available to an alternative remedy taker. This process could theoretically continue for up to 20 consecutive IATA seasons.

Leave a Reply to sturgeon Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please click here to read our data protection policy before submitting your comment

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.