Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

Flying to or from the US? Your new rights if your flight gets delayed or cancelled

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Since joining Head for Points, I’ve covered EU and UK regulations regarding the right to compensation, refund or re-routing when things go wrong during your flight. Everything from what you are entitled to if you are downgraded to what airlines must do if they cancel your flight.

Those regulations only cover UK and European airlines, or flights departing those countries. Flights by foreign airlines into the UK and Europe were not covered, and neither were flights between other countries.

The US Department of Transport has now introduced its own consumer rights rules for air travel for flights, on any carrier, which land in or depart the United States. It is not an exact copy of EU261 but it does introduce some key protections as well as a big improvement in how refunds are issued (hint: automatically).

The official summary of the new rules is here and the formal wording is here.

Refunds for cancelled flights

If the airline cancels your flight, you are entitled to a full refund, including any taxes and ancillary fees (eg. pre-paid baggage, wifi, meals etc).

This only applies if you do not accept an airline’s offer of alternative flights or accept a voucher, credit or other form of compensation offered by the airline.

Only unflown portions of a ticket are eligible for refund. Airlines do not need to provide a refund for flown portions of a connecting itinerary, for example.

Refunds when your flight is delayed

The regulation also introduces refunds for any flights that are “significantly delayed”. What does that mean? Fortunately, the rule is very specific. A significant delay comprises:

  • A delay of three hours or more from when departing or arriving on a domestic flight
  • A delay of six hours or more when departing or arriving on an international flight

In order to be eligible for a refund, you must reject any alternative flights or offers of compensation.

Refunds when your flight is changed

You are also eligible for a refund if your flight is changed from what you originally booked. This includes:

  • Changes to the departure or arrival airports
  • An increase in the number of layovers versus what was booked
  • A downgrade from the booked class of service

Passengers with disabilities get additional protections when:

  • The connecting airports change from what was booked
  • An aircraft with specific accessibility features is changed to one without them

Importantly, you only qualify for a refund for delay or flight change if you do not travel on the delayed flight or reject an alternative flight if offered. It is not a form of compensation, unlike payments made under EU261.

Refunds for delayed bags

You are now also entitled to get baggage fees refunded if your bag does not arrive in a timely manner:

  • 12 hours or more for domestic flights
  • 15 hours or more for international flights that are 12 hours or less
  • 30 hours or more for international flights that are 12 hours or longer

To be eligible for a refund you must file a mishandled baggage report with the airline.

Refunds for wifi or seat selection

The regulation also requires airlines to refund any services that were paid for but were not provided or broken. The rule covers all “ancillary services related to air travel.” This could include:

  • Inflight wifi that was broken or unavailable
  • Pre-booked seat selection where the booked seat was not available
  • Inflight entertainment that was paid for but not available
  • Pre-ordered meals that were not provided

Credit vouchers for future pandemics

A covid clause has also been added to the rules. This requires airlines to provide travel credit or vouchers valid for a minimum of five years, when:

  • You have been advised not to travel during a serious public health emergency to protect yourself from serious communicable diseases
  • You have been prohibited from travel or required to quarantine for a substantial portion of your trip by a government entity due to a public health emergency
  • You are advised not to travel by a licensed medical professional because you are likely to have a serious communicable disease and would threaten the health of others

In each case, you must have booked your flights prior to the health emergency being declared or the government-imposed restrictions are put in place.

Refunds must be automatic and prompt

Unlike EU261, which requires passengers to claim refunds or compensation by contacting the airline, the rules issued by the US Department of Transport are clear that refunds should be issued automatically, unless a passenger actively accepts an alternative offer of flights, vouchers, credit or other compensation.

Simply ignoring or not responding to an alternative offer requires the airline to automatically refund the affected flight.

However, you are not entitled to a refund if you accept a rebooked flight or continue with a significantly changed itinerary.

Refunds must be issued within seven business days for credit card purchases and within 20 calendar days for all other payments including cash, check and debit card. The refund will be issued to the original form of payment.

Which flights are covered by these rules?

The rules are clear that the refund requirements apply to any flights “on a scheduled flight to, from or within the United States.”

That means any flights that depart or arrive at airports in the United States are covered, including on foreign airlines.

Interestingly, it means that flights from the UK and Europe to the United States are covered by both EU261 and the Department of Transport’s rules. Any compensation under EU261 is likely to be more generous, although it won’t be issued automatically.

If you want to learn more, you can work your way through the official documentation here.

Comments (52)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • The Original Nick. says:

    Slightly OT – A friend of mine is stuck in Frankfurt as her flight with BA scheduled for today was cancelled yesterday. She has been put on a flight tomorrow back to LHR.
    Can someone send me a link for compensation EU261 please. And what is she entitled too?

    • Kristina says:

      This will be due to weather (storm in the Uk) so all she is entitled to is airline getting her home and providing meals/accommodation in the meantime. No compensation.

    • BA Flyer IHG Stayer says:

      Loads of threads on what to do on the disruption board

      but form is on the BA wensite

      likely no comepnstion as cancellation due to weather. She can claim cost of hotel and meals.

    • Rob says:

      Nothing, if its weather related, except for hotel / food.

      €250 otherwise plus overnight costs IIRC.

      Forms are on ba.com.

  • Rui N. says:

    This article is completely wrong. There are no such new rights. There is a proposed regulation with the open public consultation having just started: https://www.transportation.gov/briefing-room/dot-launches-rulemaking-protect-passengers-stranded-airline-disruptions
    It’s up to the Trump administration to decide what and when to implement any new rules (if any).

  • dundj says:

    Rui N, I think the article relates to those announced in May which went live a few weeks back, possibly the end of October. The latest round of proposed protections you are mentioning which are more EC/UK261 like, which are yet to be signed into law.

    • JDB says:

      Yes, the refund rights described in this article came into effect in mid-August and don’t offer a lot for Europe based passengers (or in reality US) and could even (per other comments) work against you. The proposal to add compensation is just that at this stage.

      • dundj says:

        Exactly, and due to talks which are currently taking place this is something that I have been taking a far more active engagement with to understand the regulations in case of greatly increased flights between the UK and US from airports away from LHR.

  • Ben says:

    So you buy a cheap ticket well in advance of travel, the flight is cancelled on the day of travel, so you get your refund and then have to buy an expensive on the day ticket to get to your destination? Seems the be possible and no compensation.

    In reality I think the US airlines are good at rerouting in the event of a cancellation, but doesn’t seems to be much consumer protection there.

  • Sam says:

    So if you’re flying UK-US and impacted on a flight where EU261 will/should be payable will you have to find a way of rejecting the automatic payment due within 7 days under US law to enable you to claim (the more substantial) EU261 compensation? What happens if that’s then rejected, or the airline plays hardball – can you then go back and claim the refund under the US regulations?

    If say BA has a flight that it cancels and it knows is liable for EU261, it can bring forward payment to 24 hours under US regulations for anyone that rejects initial rerouting, thus saving itself a fortune as it won’t then be subject to EU261 compensation claims? Could this actually be a loophole in certain cases that will reduce our rights?

    Or am I overthinking this?!

  • Vbop says:

    Nothing on Canada? Was travelling with my wife back Business Class to LHR from Vancouver via Calgary during the Summer and Calgary leg cancelled due to mechanical fault. Rescheduled on to a later flight that got delayed due to staff shortages, so would miss London connection from Calgary. Rescheduled 24 hours (arrived26 hours late) later and they refused compensation as the mechanucal issue with first flight was beyond their control. Paid for overnight hotel $80 total for 2 xfood ( breakfast in Canada for 2). Refused to even pay for luggage storage ( we had been away for 3 weeks Cruise etc). Never Air Canada again!

  • Philondon says:

    Slightly OT – my partner’s mother flew BA Premium Economy from Denver to LHR and her seat was faulty and so would not recline. Is she officially due any compensation or is it goodwill of BA when a complaint is made?

    • JDB says:

      For practical purposes it’s a matter of goodwill and the ‘compensation’ offered varies enormously – there’s no set tariff. In theory you might have some sort of contractual claim, but you don’t really want to go there!

      • Nick says:

        If the airline advertises something as a feature of the product and doesn’t then provide it, you potentially have a claim under the Consumer Rights Act. However, it could require a legal claim to get anywhere, so you should consider carefully whether it’s worth the effort. A complaint to BA would normally get a decent gesture for a broken seat, if there wasn’t another empty one in the same cabin you could have moved into.

        • JDB says:

          Airline ticket contracts are specifically excluded under the CRA as they technically don’t constitute consumer contracts so any potential claim would be under other consumer protection legislation. Not something to contemplate unless you know what you are doing and can make place some objectively justifiable sum on the defective seat issues based on what exactly was wrong with the seat and how it affected you.

          • NFH says:

            That’s not correct. I have litigated against a major UK airline concerning multiple breaches of contract and misrepresentations, and below is what I learnt.

            Between the time of embarkation and disembarkation, the overriding authority is the Montreal Convention. If a breach of contract occurs within this temporal scope, then domestic legislation, such as the Consumer Rights Act 2015, wouldn’t apply, as the Montreal Convention overrides it. There’s plenty of case law about this.

            On the other hand, if a breach of contract occurs outside this temporal scope, then domestic law can apply. So if an airline’s web site says that online check-in can be used, then this forms a binding contractual term under Section 50 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015, and a passenger could claim a price reduction under Section 56 if online check-in is denied, for example because of the inconvenience of having to arrive early at the airport to get a good seat.

            Similarly if a misrepresentation occurs outside the Montreal Convention’s temporal scope, even if it concerns something that is supposed to happen within its temporal scope, then the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 applies. An example would be an airline advertising a flat bed in business class but the reality is that some or all of its aircraft do not have flat beds in business class. This would not include an airline advertising wifi and then the wifi not working on a particular occasion, as that would be a breach of contract (occurring within the temporal scope) as opposed to a misrepresentation (occurring outside the temporal scope).

          • Ken says:

            JDB

            This is incorrect.

            The Consumer Rights Act 2015 originally had exemptions (not exclusions) for rail and aviation.

            These exemptions were scrapped from 1st October 2016 (and 12 months later for rail) after consultation.

          • JDB says:

            I am aware of the temporary exemption to which you refer, but it’s the Search
            Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 which is relevant here. There is the same carve out in Scottish law.

          • JDB says:

            @Ken – to the extent that you doubt my comment, one of the better known cases that examines the non applicability of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 – see NIALL CALDWELL & ANOR AGAINST EASYJET AIRLINE.

          • NFH says:

            @JDB – Paragraph 7 of the judgment quotes Article 29 of the Montreal Convention and goes on to state “Accordingly, in my opinion, the Montreal Convention is the sole regulatory instrument which governs all claims for damages arising out of international air carriage in the UK“. This reflects my own comments above.

          • JDB says:

            @NFH – yes. It’s @Ken who has misunderstood the situation. Anyone wishing to make a contractual claim against an airline needs to make sure they frame their claim correctly. Many are struck out or dismissed for want of using the correct legislation. The safest thing is to issue the claim relying on the MC and the various different consumer protection statutes as appropriate to the specific claim. The CRA isn’t the friend some think it is for airline claims. The MC is also a useful route for applying EC261 in UK courts.

          • NFH says:

            Yes. The Montreal Convention applies for any event that occurs after embarkation and before disembarkation. Domestic legislation applies for events that occur outside this period, including misrepresentation about events that are supposed to happen within this period.

          • Dubious says:

            Does the Montreal Convention still trump other statues on wholly domestic flights?

          • NFH says:

            @Dubious – Probably not, given that at the very beginning Article 1 states “This Convention applies to all international carriage of persons, baggage or cargo performed by aircraft for reward” and “For the purposes of this Convention, the expression international carriage means any carriage in which, according to the agreement between the parties, the place of departure and the place of destination, whether or not there be a break in the carriage or a transhipment, are situated either within the territories of two States Parties, or within the territory of a single State Party if there is an agreed stopping place within the territory of another State, even if that State is not a State Party.Carriage between two points within the territory of a single State Party without an agreed stopping place within the territory of another State is not international carriage for the purposes of this Convention“.

  • NorthernLass says:

    I had to contact the DOT twice during the pandemic to get refunds which an airline wouldn’t pay out. There’s a really easy form to fill in on the website. Even though it was Cayman Airways (so not even a US airline), they were really quick and efficient at dealing with the claim and both times I got my money back in less than 8 weeks.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.