Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

EXCLUSIVE: Virgin Atlantic cancels Sao Paulo before flights even start (for the 2nd time)

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Earlier this year, Virgin Atlantic confirmed it would (re-)launch flights to Sao Paulo after earlier plans were nixed by covid. It was to be Virgin Atlantic’s first foray into South America.

The plan was to launch in May 2024 with a daily, all year, service.

Readers with long memories will remember that Virgin Atlantic originally announced this route in March 2019, to launch in March 2020. We already had our invitation to join Sir Richard Branson on the inaugural flight before covid scuppered the plans.

Virgin Atlantic cancels Sao Paulo before flights even start

Virgin Atlantic has now cancelled the route for a second time. This is just three months after tickets went on sale and six months before flights are due to start.

To be more accurate, it is ‘postponed’ – but postponed for a year.

This is what the airline says:

As we continue expanding our flying programme in 2024, we have had to make careful decisions about our network. As a result, we have decided to postpone the launch of our new service between London Heathrow and Sao Paulo until 2025. We are very sorry for any disappointment this may cause. 

We are committed to flying to Brazil and look forward to welcoming you onboard in the Summer of 2025. 

Virgin Atlantic cancels Sao Paulo before flights even start

With tickets only having been on sale for three months, and with flights not due to start until next May, it would be odd if the flights had been pulled due to poor sales. That said, this is a route where Virgin Atlantic will compete with both British Airways and LATAM.

It is also a long route, and one aircraft could do two runs to the US East Coast, Middle East or Israel in the time taken for one trip to Brazil. Perhaps Virgin Atlantic is facing issues with aircraft out for maintenance checks? It could also be down to something else entirely, such as regulatory issues.

Whatever the reason, I will have to pack away my samba gear for another 12 months.

There is no announcement on the Virgin Atlantic website, except for the fact that the Sao Paulo page here now says ‘Flights commence summer 2025’.


How to earn Virgin Points from UK credit cards

How to earn Virgin Points from UK credit cards (April 2025)

As a reminder, there are various ways of earning Virgin Points from UK credit cards.  Many cards also have generous sign-up bonuses.

You can choose from two official Virgin Atlantic credit cards (apply here, the Reward+ card has a bonus of 18,000 Virgin Points and the free card has a bonus of 3,000 Virgin Points):

Virgin Atlantic Reward+ Mastercard

18,000 bonus points and 1.5 points for every £1 you spend Read our full review

Virgin Atlantic Reward Mastercard

3,000 bonus points, no fee and 1 point for every £1 you spend Read our full review

You can also earn Virgin Points from various American Express cards – and these have sign-up bonuses too.

American Express Preferred Rewards Gold is FREE for a year and comes with 20,000 Membership Rewards points, which convert into 20,000 Virgin Points.

American Express Preferred Rewards Gold

Your best beginner’s card – 30,000 points, FREE for a year & four airport lounge passes Read our full review

The Platinum Card from American Express comes with 50,000 Membership Rewards points, which convert into 50,000 Virgin Points.

The Platinum Card from American Express

80,000 bonus points and great travel benefits – for a large fee Read our full review

Small business owners should consider the two American Express Business cards. Points convert at 1:1 into Virgin Points.

American Express Business Platinum

50,000 points when you sign-up and an annual £200 Amex Travel credit Read our full review

American Express Business Gold

20,000 points sign-up bonus and FREE for a year Read our full review

Click here to read our detailed summary of all UK credit cards which earn Virgin Points

Comments (108)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • BajiNahid says:

    It’s definitely poor ticket sales. Virgin should quit asia flying too and stick to being the under carrier for delta airlines and fly to the US only. I don’t see the need of virgin flying to Asia. Their sky team partners can do that for them.

    • Rhys says:

      My flight from Shanghai was full last week!

      • Richie says:

        A Shanghai hotel review would be interesting.

      • BajiNahid says:

        It may be full! But it wont be profitable!

        • Danny says:

          How do you know it isn’t profitable 😂 Doubt there’s much appetite for yet more flights to cities in North America part funded by city subsidies. Would be nice to see HKG return or another Asian destination.

          I know BKK is low yield but maybe it would be an interesting choice.

        • Kieran says:

          Someone knows better than the Virgin revenue and commercial teams apparently.

  • Joe says:

    Any news on when Virgin start flying and
    releasing seats to Korea?

    • Rob says:

      It only happens if the Korean / Asiana merger completes. If the merger falls apart, and it is very much on/off these days, it won’t happen.

      • Charles Martel says:

        What are your thoughts on the probability of it happening? I like the look of their FF programme but it doesn’t really work for me within SkyTeam.

  • RJ says:

    Wish they would go back to HKG.

  • Dan says:

    Oh dear. It seems Virgin is a bit stuck. Where can they expand to? Going East you are competing with much better middle east carriers, West you are competing with your partner Delta!

    • Niall says:

      South and Central America seem sensible

      • Dan says:

        Does South and Central America have the revenue/traffic though?

        • Andrew says:

          Clearly not hence this story

          • Rhys says:

            That’s not quite right, as Virgin have clearly stated they do intend to run the route – eventually.

            This delay could be down to a number of things – slots, aircraft availability, regulatory approvals etc etc.

    • AL says:

      I would prefer that they start to drop some existing routes – SEA being a prime example – and replace it with, say, ORD. Shake up the US route network a bit, and land in areas that aren’t Delta hubs, to at least allow some direct connectivity.

      In to the ME is, I agree, a risky strategy, although DXB will work for them. But continuing further East is a good idea – skipping the need to change AF/KL/EK/QR etc. at CDG/AMS/DXB/DOH etc.

      • RB says:

        Seattle *might* be a fair point – a decent tourism destination/gateway for the PNW and attracts a fair bit of service from other European carriers – but I’m really not sure what other Delta hubs you think they could drop. One flight a day operated by Virgin is hardly excessive. New York and Boston obviously get Virgin flights. The same for LAX.

        • Nick says:

          I always love comments from armchair network planners with no clue how airlines actually work. LON-ORD with few options for connecting feed at either end is almost the worst idea you could think of. Trying to compete against multiple daily on AA/BA and UA, all with huge connecting volumes and the higher P2P corporate yields this brings (through frequency) is a death wish.

          At least SEA is a huge DL hub with decent connections. It’s actually better than BA/AA options for states neighbouring WA, and almost perfect connections to/from Hawaii. BOS similarly has strong inland flows with weaker connections from BA.

        • AL says:

          I’m not necessarily advocating dropping DL hubs, but given we have some focus away from AUS now (which has resulted in some change of service to MIA), there is at least some flexibility in the network. MIA is a good hub, mind, for the connections to South American and the southern states.

  • Amy C says:

    GRU seemed a weird one to me. GIG surely more popular? Wonder how Dubai is working out for them. Japan could be good?

    • Rhys says:

      GRU is a business destination, GIG a leisure one.

      • Amy C says:

        And I always think of Virgin as more of a leisure airline. Least outside of East Coast US.

      • JDB says:

        GRU also has much better connectivity which makes it a more balanced business vs leisure destination and has better cargo prospects. The most horrendous place for business.

      • SadOldMan says:

        maybe generally but player two and I were booked there in May for leisure.
        We have several 241 and have done enough of the US

  • Bob says:

    The big news here is that we are not yet to see you Rhys in your samba gear!

    🙂

  • Phil says:

    Flew to Dehli with Virgin last week. Both legs pretty full.

    • Al_Wiltshire says:

      I regularly fly to Mumbai with Virgin. They’re generally full. I have no idea about profitability though.

  • G says:

    Near-Far destinations? Morocco, Egypt, Tel Aviv (when the security situation improves?).

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.