Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

What’s going on at Global Airlines, the new UK airline which has bought four used A380s?

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

Last Thursday was the official launch party for the UK’s newest airline, Global Airlines.

You may already have heard of them: they caused a splash a few weeks ago when they announced they had purchased (yes, bought outright) four A380 aircraft. The first has already been delivered.

It’s not everyday that a start-up airline buys aircraft, let alone the world’s largest passenger plane, which many airlines have already written off. It was the first suggestion that this is more than a paper airline. It also suggests that whoever is behind Global Airlines has deep pockets.

Global Airlines, the new airline hoping to fly A380s to New York

I had hoped that Thursday’s event would have pulled back the curtain a little more on the airline’s progress and plans, but unfortunately there were virtually no new announcements, apart from that “we are a lot further along than people think”.

But let’s start at the beginning ….

Who is behind Global Airlines?

Global Airlines was founded by James Asquith. I think it’s fair to describe James as one of the original travel influencers: he became the youngest person to visit all 196 countries around the world a decade ago and now has more than one million followers on Instagram.

Since then, James has set up a holiday home-swapping website Holiday Swap.

In addition to James, Global Airlines has announced that Richard Stephenson has joined as COO. Richard started his career at British Airways in 1998 and more recently spent six years as communications director of the Civil Aviation Authority. Whilst he doesn’t have any recent airline experience, he should at least understand how difficult it is to launch a new airline and help Global pass the necessary hurdles.

Also joining Global is Liam McKay. Liam comes from London City Airport where he was Director of Corporate Affairs, dealing with PR, marketing and regulation.

Where is the money coming from?

Launching a brand new airline doesn’t come cheap. A few companies have tried it in recent years, including flyPop and Hans Airways, both of which wanted to launch UK – India flights. Neither has begun operations.

That said, there is clearly serious money behind Global Airlines; you don’t buy four A380s on a whim. In April, it was reported that Global Airlines had an in-principal investment of $60 million ready to go.

Whilst these aircraft come used (the A380 is no longer in production), you are still looking at tens of millions to buy and refurbish just one.

Where is the money coming from? At least some of it is coming from the Holiday Swap Group and other investors, including Sheikh Juma bin Dalmook Al Maktoum, a member of the Dubai ruling family.

It seems there is a fairly diverse group of investors behind this project, rather than a single person bank-rolling the whole thing.

Global Airlines, the new airline hoping to fly A380s to New York

What does Global Airlines hope to achieve?

In short, Global Airlines wants to disrupt the transatlantic aviation market by operating a fleet of premium-heavy A380s from Gatwick. The first flights are currently planned to take place to New York sometime in the summer of 2024.

Sound mad? That’s because it is!

A380s are gas guzzlers compared to next generation A350s and 787s. To achieve the same efficiency you need to fill the aircraft on virtually every flight.

Clearly it works for some airlines: Emirates continues to use it as the backbone of its fleet, delivering huge levels of capacity to and from slot-constrained airports.

Things are different in the transatlantic market. No US airlines operate A380s and in Europe only British Airways and Lufthansa do: Air France ditched its fleet during the pandemic.

If anything, the move in transatlantic flying has shifted to smaller aircraft: JetBlue now flies five times a day to London and Paris on its single-aisle A321LR, with an Amsterdam service following next month. Aer Lingus is following the same model and continues to open niche routes with its A321LR as they arrive.

Instead of using bigger aircraft, a lot of airlines are opting for long-range A321s. These are the same aircraft that you fly around Europe with, except Airbus has started improving the aircraft’s range thanks to fuel efficiency improvements. This will be extended even further with the launch of the Airbus A321XLR – or extra long range – which will open up even longer routes on these single-aisle planes.

These aircraft are far cheaper to fly, with lower operating costs thanks to their efficient size. Lifting the infrastructure for a second aisle is just weight, after all.

It is interesting to see Global Airlines head in the opposite direction and opt for the largest passenger aircraft available.

Another reason why transatlantic airlines tend to opt for medium or large aircraft, rather than very large aircraft, is that frequency is seen as key for important business routes.

Instead of flying just a handful of aircraft on a super-jumbo they want to offer business travellers a choice of flights. It’s one of the reasons why BA doesn’t operate a handful of A380s to New York but offers 12 daily flights on smaller aircraft instead (AA offer another four as part of their transatlantic joint venture.)

James clearly doesn’t agree and told City AM: “I think that too many incumbents still think it’s [about] frequency.”

Global Airlines, the new airline hoping to fly A380s to New York

What will it be like to fly Global Airlines?

Onboard, Global wants to offer a premium experience with First Class, Business Class and economy.

In fact, Global Airlines will fly aircraft with almost as many premium seats as BA has on its A380s.

The initial four A380s to arrive at Global are hand-me-downs from Singapore Airlines. These feature 471 seats with 12 in First, 60 in business class and the remaining 399 in economy.

It’s unlikely we will see Global introduce a brand-new cabin this late in the day: with flights currently due to start in Spring or Summer next year it’s more likely that the existing seats will be refurbished and reupholstered similar to how we’ve seen on other airlines recently such as Lufthansa and ITA.

This also helps Global avoid the scrum for new business class seats. Supply chain issues are causing real issues for airlines, as we heard from Malaysia Airlines CEO Datuk Captain Izham Ismail in our recent interview.

That means that Global Airlines will likely fly with Singapore’s previous cabins. Whilst not the latest or most modern, these are still excellent seats, with all-aisle access in business class and relatively modern in-flight entertainment.

It’s unclear what the rest of the experience will entail. No announcements have been made yet about onboard catering or airport services such as lounge access. Whilst the obvious thing to do would be to use a contract lounge, Gatwick has an abandoned lounge in its North Terminal which Global could, potentially, take over.

Global Airlines, the new airline hoping to fly A380s to New York

The road ahead

That said, there are a lot of hurdles standing in the way of Global Airlines taking off.

For a start, the airline doesn’t have an Operating Licence or Air Operator Certificate (AOC) which can take substantial time to develop. Assuming the cash keeps flowing, regulatory issues are most likely to prevent the airline from flying.

It took fellow transatlantic airline Norse Atlantic approximately two years to receive its UK AOC. It’s not clear how far along in this process Global may be, but Asquith did mention that he has been working on the project more seriously for the past two years.

It will also have to deal with:

  • obtaining take-off and landing slots
  • getting access to gates (A380 gates at JFK may not be easy to get, and I think Gatwick only has one gate which can take an A380)
  • achieving an operating licence and other permits in the US
  • applying for permission to sell tickets in the US
  • finding A380-suitable hangars and maintenance facilities in the UK, given that only British Airways currently bases A380 aircraft here and is unlikely to share

….. and so on. Aviation is a highly complex, highly regulated industry: never let it be said that launching an airline was easy. The difference between Global and other (failed) long-haul start-up carriers in the last 20 years is that they tended to buy or develop out of existing small airlines to short cut some of the licencing rules.

Global Airlines, the new airline hoping to fly A380s to New York

American Express is an early partner

Very little new information was announced at the launch party on Thursday night, bar that a partnership with American Express has been inked after a year-long negotiation process.

Whilst James didn’t reveal what this partnership entailed, a follow up press release offered clarification:

“Ahead of the first flight in 2024, American Express and Global will collaborate on bespoke offers for Amex Cardmembers on the inaugural services between London Gatwick and New York’s JFK. The agreement will also see a range of exclusive fly-drive offers, hotel stays, and restaurant bookings made available to Cardmembers …. American Express Cardmembers will be among the first to be able to purchase tickets across all three cabins onboard the Global Airlines A380 aircraft

From the sounds of it, that means that there will be some sort of offers on Amex cards (cashback or otherwise) and that you will be able to use your Amex to pay for the flights. Not exactly ground-breaking stuff. That said, the press release included quotes from American Express’s UK ‘Merchant Services’ head Dan Edelman, including:

“With our long history in travel, this new partnership is hugely exciting for us.”

There were no other announcements, although James did tease various potential partnerships. “Margaret Dabbs are a big part of what we’re doing for the amenity kits as well.”

Other brands, including Laurent Perrier Champagne, the Isle of Wight Distillery, Longbottom & Co bloody mary mix providers and Rova Madagascan Caviar were at the event as well, hinting at unconfirmed tie-ups.

What about a loyalty scheme?

Loyalty appears to be a big part of the Global Airlines offering and on display were several status cards for the upcoming loyalty programme which appears to be called ‘Global Aviator’. James said:

“There are people in this room that understand the loyalty platforms and how that works – better than me. And sometimes I lean on some of their advice as well. But I think that’s another area that we are really going to push strongly.”

For now, it appears there are five tiers: Bronze, Silver, Gold, Platinum and Titanium.

Global Airlines is on the defensive

There is a lot of scepticism in the aviation industry about whether Global Airlines will ever make it.

In part this is self-inflicted, with an early 2021 investor deck making the rounds and extolling plans for a ‘gamer class’ and naive (if not downright absurd) cost-estimates for refurbishing the aircraft and predicting a 100-strong fleet by 2025. It reads more like a school project than a genuine business case.

Based on my conversations with Global Airlines, the 2021 investor deck is no longer relevant and Global is pursuing a different strategy. “We’re trying to be realistic. And to be clear, there is no gamer class!”

Comparing the media negativity to the reception Richard Branson got with Virgin Atlantic in 1984, he said “it’s the same thing that happened, I guess, 39, 40 years ago for the airline. But it’s very well known today. All the naysayers said ‘this would not work’. And they push really hard for it.”

“There are people in this room that have said the transatlantic market is littered with failed carriers – and it absolutely is. Because they all do the same thing. Over the last three and a half decades they’ve competed on price, and it’s a race to the bottom largely. They either do that, or all-premium product across the Atlantic. We’re doing it very differently.”

Conclusion

A lot of questions clearly remain. On the face of it, Global Airlines is flying in the face of conventional aviation strategy, at least across the Atlantic. No airline start-up has ever launched with the A380 as its first aircraft.

That said …. whoever is backing Global Airlines clearly believes that it can work and has the money to throw money behind it.

My personal view is that it is always exciting to see new airlines launch, particularly in a market as crowded as the one between the UK and US, which now fields flights from six different airlines.

At the very least, it will be interesting to see how Global Airlines evolves over the coming years and I wish the team the best of luck. I am looking to seeing what they have to offer.

Will it fly? Let’s see.

Comments (209)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Chris W says:

    I’m following along with interest whether this actually takes off or not. There is clearly some serious money coming from somewhere, and I doubt they would be invested if there was not a realistic business plan.
    If they hadn’t taken delivery of any aircraft it would seem more “pie in the sky” but they have, so now it seems more real.
    I would assume they are working hard on things like their AOC, slots at both ends, lounge access (Clubrooms Gatwick would work for their F pax), and refurbishing the seats. No Y+ on a new long-haul airline is just bizarre.

    Do they have an office where these legitimate management people work from? Doesn’t James live in Dubai? How do you run an airline from your bedroom?

    This whole disruption thing, how are they planning to do that? The only real thing you could disrupt are fare prices, which Jetblue are already doing, provided you are happy to fly on a single-aisle, and Norse with their carefully, carefully approach.

    An awful lot to do in less than 12 months, but please keep us updated!

  • Paul says:

    Absolutely doomed to fail. Utterly ridiculous!

    As this post might be in the future, but I doubt it!

    We don’t need more capacity to the USA, we need capacity elsewhere and an end to the alliances that allow for fares and schedules to be carved up and return to proper competition.

    • Chris W says:

      Where do we need capacity where there isn’t? The ME3 have lots of capacity to Australia and Asia.
      Okay, without the Chinese carriers flooding the market, prices are higher than before the pandemic, but surely those carriers will return over the next 12 months?
      I suspect Global chose New York because they realised people will pay more money to fly there than to, say, Thailand.

      • Londonsteve says:

        Really, will they? I’d pay a lot more to fly to Thailand than to New York. Not only because it’s further but because I’ve a far greater interest in actually travelling there. Meanwhile, the high margin business market won’t be migrating to this upstart any time soon and there’s a finite number of those travellers in any case, albeit they can be extremely profitable. I can’t see a Goldman MD flying Global any time soon, he or she values their status with their chosen alliance (or that indirectly chosen for them by the travel policies of their employer), not to mention when flying OW or *A there’s zero chance of having to stay overnight when a plane’s gone technical and having to miss family time as a result.

        • Londonsteve says:

          Mind you, I’d fly them on a cheap ticket for the novelty of experiencing the A380 before it goes out of service, visit MOMA, stay in someone’s spare room after a Chipotle dinner (no tip) and fly home the next day. If ops went belly up, I know I’ve got my Avios to fall back on and can book any one of the zillions of flights to London at the last minute.

          • @mkcol says:

            Oh I’m liking this.

            Book cheapo ticket knowing if there’s IRROPS you’ll likely get UK261 compo to pay for your trip + the fallback position of Avios/Virgin points to get you there/back.

            I’m in!

          • Novice says:

            😂 agree with everything you said @London steve

          • Lady London says:

            Wasn’t there similar coverage of an airline where it seemed it could be an insurance play?

            The problem with EU261 is credit risk

      • Paul says:

        East and South! ME3 may offer the capacity but it’s via the ME and a stop. If they had to compete with direct services on a more robust basis fares would fall. But as IAG is part owned by QR its not going to happen.

  • Gav says:

    More competition = lower prices all round- least in the short term, can only be good for the consumer- whoever you fly with. I wish them well!

    • Paul says:

      Except it won’t make a dent with just 4 second hand A380 aircraft. AA/BA stick up across the pond with IB and AY in tow is matched only by DL/VS.
      Please provide a single example of where allowing commercial agreements has resulted in lowering airfares or increasing quality?
      BA became the worlds favourite airline in the 1990 because it faced real competition from Pan Am, TWA and United and looming open skies. The bought out domestic competitors, tried to undermine another, and when that all failed they sought out tie ups covering everyone from KLM, USAir and many many more before alighting on IB and AA

  • vlcnc says:

    An absurd idea for an airline, and with people who habitual liars as that deck showed.

  • Andrew says:

    I’ve worked in the airline industry for 25 years and in my humble opinion this is going to be a spectacular fail.

    It simply is not possible where thousands of other experienced airline execs haven’t been able to figure out how to make second hand A380’s work that a guy with zero airline experience can do so.

    The CEO Janes Asquith’s primary interest is to elevate his social media following. When the airline goes bang, at the very least he grew his name and online zombie followers.

    Has disaster written all over it. Eventually the backers will pull out when they don’t want to keep throwing good money after bad.

    Richard Branson he Ain’t!

  • Lady London says:

    Australia would be more credible, and possibly have a market.

    • Londonsteve says:

      Now there’s a thought…

    • QFFlyer says:

      Would it though? We’ve got the ME3 and Chinese carriers, plus MH, SQ, JL, UA, AA, AC, TG, and others I can’t think of, providing capacity on top of QF, plus BA’s daily token gesture to SYD. Flights are busy, but it’s not impossible to get a seat. Even FJ are providing connections to Canada/US from MEL/SYD/BNE via NAN.

      • QFFlyer says:

        Plus, a loaded A380 would need to connect somewhere, so there’s that, plus fifth freedom rights to agree (if so desired). The A380 can make it to DRW, as demonstrated by QF at the start of the pandemic, from LHR, but that still involves a connection to the east coast. I assume QF don’t consider it viable, since they’ve stuck to B787s (and via PER, DRW was only a thing while WA was being touchy about their precious border).

      • Londonsteve says:

        Clearly there are zillions of ways to get to Australia but with the shrivelling of BA’s service and QF heading towards a non-step, high margin, premium offering, I do think there’s a market for U.K. to Australia services that minimise time in the air (and thus the environmental impact) are good value, breaking the journey mid way at a sensible location that suits our biorhythms much better than a Middle East transit. Ideal would be breaking the journey half way, cutting the flight into two 10 hour legs and offering free stops offs for customers that aren’t inclined to do the journey in one go. The assurance and comfort of the A380 would serve as a further draw on such a marathon journey. Ironically when confronted with so much choice, it would be a fairly unique offering.

        • Hb133 says:

          Having just done an Australia – london trip again (with two boys under 5 in economy) I’m all for the Middle East transits. Taking a night flight out of Aus gives a great opportunity for sleep (kids 10-11 hours, us over 8 hours of bad economy sleep) making the day flight to london of 7 hours almost the tougher flight. Returning the same with morning flight out of Uk and night flight to Aus landing in afternoon / early evening and a chance for a shower and walk in the Middle East transit. Definitely our preference routing wise companies to the double night flights with ba etc from Uk to Aus.

        • GRAEME says:

          Agree with that, a 2 x 10-ish hour trip would be very attractive, but the only real option is probably India. Thailand is moving into Singapore/KL territory.

        • QFFlyer says:

          Time in the air doesn’t minimise enviro impact though – the non-stop flights that QF operate are worse than those with a stopover, because of the extra fuel they have to burn, to carry the extra fuel required for the journey (ironic).

          I do agree that a mid-way stop is ideal, I’ve done the non-stop and even in J I was restless, 17.5 hours is too much (and I do really love flying).

          Fair point re comfort of the A380, they’ll need to fill it to make it viable (I expect), but we shall see. I was sceptical that Rex, who decided to launch capital city services between MEL-SYD, in the middle of the pandemic, would be able to make it work, but they’re still going and actually expanding their jet services, so I’m willing to eat my scepticism!

      • Paul says:

        I am doing SYD this New Year via LAX on DL. While the flights might be fine the tediousness of transiting the USA is not something I am looking forward to. Indeed, they simply do not recognise the concept of transit and I must have a ESTA and clear both myself and luggage through US immigration and customs, despite not going there. Its farcical and I would suggest one of the main reason people do not route down under via the USA

    • Novice says:

      Yes and maybe they should try to tap the north as in MAN if it’s got capacity

    • Lady London says:

      If you could fill, say, 4 A380’s a week in each direction, mostly Y (and in Y the A380 is the best aircraft) with just those few premim seats, Yes I think there is enough tourist interest in Australia to sell it and fill it.

      It’s a route that suits the A380 – remember it’s an aircraft optimised for passengers that needs to run close to full, as it doesn’t have the freight capacity of other new ones.

      Chinese airlines and CX are still hampered a bit or basket cases like Thai and Air India – so Asian compeition I suspect there is a place to refuel if they don’t want to do Western Australia (and it has to be SYD or MEL I think, to sell it).

      I think it could definitely be priced to appeal for UK holidays, you’d be busy enough all but, say, around 2 months-worth of weeks per year. As the seasons are inverted so Oz demand is there when UK demand is less. Just a bit quiet in November and a few other weeks here and there.

      Would also put a rocket up Quantas’s pricing longhaul which is long overdue

  • Tiger of ham says:

    Looking at his insta he’s off to a few business meetings in the Middle East

    Don’t the ME3 have limits on how many flights they can fly into America ?

    Could this be a feeder service for a ME3 carrier into the US.

    Didn’t even eithad do something similar with an Italian carrier ?

  • r* says:

    I suspect the only thing theyll be disrupting are ppls travel plans if they plan to travel on them.

    This whole thing reads like one of the publicity events one of those dodgy F1 sponsors that dont actually exist put on.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.