Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

SOLD OUT: Heathrow tells airlines to stop selling ANY flights until 11th September

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

The Summer air travel situation took a surprising turn on Tuesday when Heathrow effectively stopped airlines from selling any further seats for flights this Summer.

In an open letter, Heathrow CEO John Holland-Kaye said that the airport had realised that it was, effectively, no longer possible for it to offer the level of service it wanted this Summer and that something had to give.

This is especially true for ground handling staff – albeit these are not employed by the airport – which are still chronically below the number required.

Kaye’s solution is to cap Heathrow passenger numbers at 100,000 per day for the Summer period, which they are specifying as ending on 11th September.

This would be fine, except that airlines have already sold an average of 101,500 tickets per day and seats are still on sale.

Effectively immediately, Heathrow has requested:

  • the closure for sale of all flights departing from the airport until 11th September
  • a reduction in the expected passenger numbers from 101,500 to 100,000 per day

Whilst airlines are not legally bound to follow this, Heathrow will respond by forcing airlines to cancel additional flights if they do not do so.

One way or another, only 100,000 people per day are flying from the airport this Summer.

Whilst not discussed in this letter, the airport is also believed to be considering restrictions on checked luggage and, as it did yesterday for same-day rebooking, banning airlines from rebooking passengers whose flights are cancelled, since this does not nothing to reduce passenger numbers in total.

Heathrow tells BA (and other airlines) to stop selling tickets for the Summer period

Here is the full statement:

The global aviation industry is recovering from the pandemic, but the legacy of COVID continues to pose challenges for the entire sector as it rebuilds capacity.  At Heathrow, we have seen 40 years of passenger growth in just four months. Despite this, we managed to get the vast majority of passengers away smoothly on their journeys through the Easter and half term peaks. This was only possible because of close collaboration and planning with our airport partners including airlines, airline ground handlers and Border Force.   

We started recruiting back in November last year in anticipation of capacity recovering this summer, and by the end of July, we will have as many people working in security as we had pre-pandemic. We have also reopened and moved 25 airlines into Terminal 4 to provide more space for passengers and grown our passenger service team.    

New colleagues are learning fast but are not yet up to full speed. However, there are some critical functions in the airport which are still significantly under resourced, in particular ground handlers, who are contracted by airlines to provide check-in staff, load and unload bags and turnaround aircraft. They are doing the very best they can with the resources available and we are giving them as much support possible, but this is a significant constraint to the airport’s overall capacity. 

However, over the past few weeks, as departing passenger numbers have regularly exceeded 100,000 a day, we have started to see periods when service drops to a level that is not acceptable: long queue times, delays for passengers requiring assistance, bags not travelling with passengers or arriving late, low punctuality and last-minute cancellations. This is due to a combination of reduced arrivals punctuality (as a result of delays at other airports and in European airspace) and increased passenger numbers starting to exceed the combined capacity of airlines, airline ground handlers and the airport.  Our colleagues are going above and beyond to get as many passengers away as possible, but we cannot put them at risk for their own safety and wellbeing.   

Last month, the DfT and CAA wrote to the sector asking us all to review our plans for the summer and ensure we were prepared to manage expected passenger levels safely and minimise further disruption. Ministers subsequently implemented a slot amnesty programme to encourage airlines to remove flights from their schedules with no penalty. We held off putting additional controls on passenger numbers until this amnesty process concluded last Friday and we had a clearer view of the reductions that airlines have made.    

Some airlines have taken significant action, but others have not, and we believe that further action is needed now to ensure passengers have a safe and reliable journey.  We have therefore made the difficult decision to introduce a capacity cap with effect from 12 July to 11 September. Similar measures to control passenger demand have been implemented at other airports both in the UK and around the world.  

“Our assessment is that the maximum number of daily departing passengers that airlines, airline ground handlers and the airport can collectively serve over the summer is no more than 100,000. The latest forecasts indicate that even despite the amnesty, daily departing seats over the summer will average 104,000 – giving a daily excess of 4,000 seats. On average only about 1,500 of these 4,000 daily seats have currently been sold to passengers, and so we are asking our airline partners to stop selling summer tickets to limit the impact on passengers.   

“By making this intervention now, our objective is to protect flights for the vast majority of passengers at Heathrow this summer and to give confidence that everyone who does travel through the airport will have a safe and reliable journey and arrive at their destination with their bags. We recognise that this will mean some summer journeys will either be moved to another day, another airport or be cancelled and we apologise to those whose travel plans are affected.   

“The airport will still be busy, as we are trying to get as many people away as possible, and we ask you to bear with us if it takes a little longer to check in, go through security or collect your bag than you are used to at Heathrow.  We ask passengers to help, by making sure they have completed all their COVID requirements online before they come to the airport, by not arriving earlier than 3 hours before their flight, by being ready for security with laptops out of bags and liquids, aerosols and gels in a sealed 100ml plastic bag, and by using e-gates in immigration where eligible. We are all recruiting as fast as we can and aim to return to the excellent service you should expect from the UK’s hub airport as soon as possible.”   

Comments (290)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • A says:

    Not surprising, from a company that can’t even get their press release correct (“by being ready for security with laptops out of bags and liquids, aerosols and gels in a sealed 100ml plastic bag..”)…
    No sympathy for the company. Every sympathy for passengers. Have they set up the classic marquee tents outside check in yet?

    • Track says:

      HAL and the industry has to do something about this ‘sealed 100 ml’.

      Heathrow airport security goes into arguments even if such plastic bag slightly unsealed.

      95% of people start sealing their liquids right on the security belt and not a second earlier.

      • meta says:

        Meanwhile at some other airports you don’t even have to take liquids out…

        • A says:

          Ha, …my post/issue was that it isn’t the bag that has to be 100ml, it is the liquid – the bag is considerably bigger.

          But yes course, the liquid thing remains ridiculous, especially when newer scanners can now handle liquids. Last time through t3 they confiscated/binned my anti perspirant gel stick thing for being 125 ml, yet completely missed that the face scrub (in smaller packaging) was 150ml – both were in the same sealed transparent (zipped) bag,

        • speedy66 says:

          LCy – we were told to leave laptop and sealed bag of liquid zipped in our hand luggage for the last 2 flights from there, to ‘speed’ up security. But Sydney domestic you can thro’ security any size liquids but on International no liquid container bigger than 100ml.

  • Jon says:

    Curious to know how this will work in practice. Say you have Overseas Airline A that has one long-haul return flight a day into LHR, with a maximum capacity of, for the sake of argument, 300 seats, and they’ve so far sold 50% of their capacity for the summer. Then let’s say you have Local Airline B with hundreds of flights a day and 80,000 seats of which they’ve sold 75%. Is it fair to ask Airline A to stop selling its seats? Wouldn’t a blanket cap disproportionately affect smaller and/or overseas airlines (and have a greater impact on their customers, eg due to daily flights being consolidated to, say, three a week or such)? Or are they giving each airline its own quota? 🤔

  • Ron Tse says:

    We’ve got two 241s redemption in CW to SFO end of this month. I will be checking my booking everyday, if they cancel I’ll be straight on the phone to BA. I’m sort of glad they’ve swap the original CS 777 to an old CW 777, at least there will be more capacity if required and also now it’s 4-class, not 3-class.

    • AspirationalFlyer says:

      I’m travelling from Houston to August, where the flights seem to have now gone from 2 to 1 per day. I was straight on the phone to BA when it got cancelled and managed to get rebooked on American.

  • James Harper says:

    FWIW, a branch of Lidl quite close to LHR is now offering rather more per hour than LHR offers security staff working shifts and any of the ground handlers offer anyone again working shifts.

    Lidl is fully staffed.

  • Abdul says:

    All I can say is

    LOL

    Hahahahhahaha

    LOL

    LHR is a dump, BA is a dump, always will be a dump

    • Lady London says:

      Sorry Abdul you’ve clearly not been in an airport that really is a dump, or even halfway to being a dump.

      Also re your comment on the Forum thread that there is case law defiining ‘convenient to the passenger’ for date of rerouting : hoping you can name a case where this was done as a number of people here would be interested i any case ref. at all as so far no one’s come across one and you mentioned you had seen some? This would be great.

  • pureshtuyot says:

    Perhaps I can get nasty and book as many Avios/Virgin points seats as possible for within 14 days (can be cancelled for a fee) and if It gets cancelled there’s a lovely compensation payout.

    A scumbag thief would say

    • babyg_wc says:

      This is why we have silly cancellation rules and why BWC couldn’t stay forever. Anywho why would you get a payout.. it’s out of the airlines control…

      • meta says:

        You won’t get any compensation as this falls under extraordinary circumstance – airport controlled capacity.

        • Magic Mike says:

          But the ground handlers – supposedly the critical path – are not employed by the airport, and are contracted to the airlines?

          Is it Heathrow’s fault, or is it the airline’s fault and Heathrow are just trying to stop the place descending into chaos?

  • can says:

    fking krist…

  • Nick G says:

    The airlines and airport operators clearly don’t sing off the same hymn sheet and I can’t blame airlines for once. If BA proactively offered for me to forfeit my flights to another airline at another airport I would seriously consider it. As it is I’ve checked and the flights still available for sale and on the schedules. Yet no doubt we will turn up to chaos adding to a problem I know already exists. With time on my hands (few weeks) it’s so frustrating to read these stories knowing it could be avoided……all this because of piss poor planning.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.