Maximise your Avios, air miles and hotel points

SOLD OUT: Heathrow tells airlines to stop selling ANY flights until 11th September

Links on Head for Points may support the site by paying a commission.  See here for all partner links.

The Summer air travel situation took a surprising turn on Tuesday when Heathrow effectively stopped airlines from selling any further seats for flights this Summer.

In an open letter, Heathrow CEO John Holland-Kaye said that the airport had realised that it was, effectively, no longer possible for it to offer the level of service it wanted this Summer and that something had to give.

This is especially true for ground handling staff – albeit these are not employed by the airport – which are still chronically below the number required.

Kaye’s solution is to cap Heathrow passenger numbers at 100,000 per day for the Summer period, which they are specifying as ending on 11th September.

This would be fine, except that airlines have already sold an average of 101,500 tickets per day and seats are still on sale.

Effectively immediately, Heathrow has requested:

  • the closure for sale of all flights departing from the airport until 11th September
  • a reduction in the expected passenger numbers from 101,500 to 100,000 per day

Whilst airlines are not legally bound to follow this, Heathrow will respond by forcing airlines to cancel additional flights if they do not do so.

One way or another, only 100,000 people per day are flying from the airport this Summer.

Whilst not discussed in this letter, the airport is also believed to be considering restrictions on checked luggage and, as it did yesterday for same-day rebooking, banning airlines from rebooking passengers whose flights are cancelled, since this does not nothing to reduce passenger numbers in total.

Heathrow tells BA (and other airlines) to stop selling tickets for the Summer period

Here is the full statement:

The global aviation industry is recovering from the pandemic, but the legacy of COVID continues to pose challenges for the entire sector as it rebuilds capacity.  At Heathrow, we have seen 40 years of passenger growth in just four months. Despite this, we managed to get the vast majority of passengers away smoothly on their journeys through the Easter and half term peaks. This was only possible because of close collaboration and planning with our airport partners including airlines, airline ground handlers and Border Force.   

We started recruiting back in November last year in anticipation of capacity recovering this summer, and by the end of July, we will have as many people working in security as we had pre-pandemic. We have also reopened and moved 25 airlines into Terminal 4 to provide more space for passengers and grown our passenger service team.    

New colleagues are learning fast but are not yet up to full speed. However, there are some critical functions in the airport which are still significantly under resourced, in particular ground handlers, who are contracted by airlines to provide check-in staff, load and unload bags and turnaround aircraft. They are doing the very best they can with the resources available and we are giving them as much support possible, but this is a significant constraint to the airport’s overall capacity. 

However, over the past few weeks, as departing passenger numbers have regularly exceeded 100,000 a day, we have started to see periods when service drops to a level that is not acceptable: long queue times, delays for passengers requiring assistance, bags not travelling with passengers or arriving late, low punctuality and last-minute cancellations. This is due to a combination of reduced arrivals punctuality (as a result of delays at other airports and in European airspace) and increased passenger numbers starting to exceed the combined capacity of airlines, airline ground handlers and the airport.  Our colleagues are going above and beyond to get as many passengers away as possible, but we cannot put them at risk for their own safety and wellbeing.   

Last month, the DfT and CAA wrote to the sector asking us all to review our plans for the summer and ensure we were prepared to manage expected passenger levels safely and minimise further disruption. Ministers subsequently implemented a slot amnesty programme to encourage airlines to remove flights from their schedules with no penalty. We held off putting additional controls on passenger numbers until this amnesty process concluded last Friday and we had a clearer view of the reductions that airlines have made.    

Some airlines have taken significant action, but others have not, and we believe that further action is needed now to ensure passengers have a safe and reliable journey.  We have therefore made the difficult decision to introduce a capacity cap with effect from 12 July to 11 September. Similar measures to control passenger demand have been implemented at other airports both in the UK and around the world.  

“Our assessment is that the maximum number of daily departing passengers that airlines, airline ground handlers and the airport can collectively serve over the summer is no more than 100,000. The latest forecasts indicate that even despite the amnesty, daily departing seats over the summer will average 104,000 – giving a daily excess of 4,000 seats. On average only about 1,500 of these 4,000 daily seats have currently been sold to passengers, and so we are asking our airline partners to stop selling summer tickets to limit the impact on passengers.   

“By making this intervention now, our objective is to protect flights for the vast majority of passengers at Heathrow this summer and to give confidence that everyone who does travel through the airport will have a safe and reliable journey and arrive at their destination with their bags. We recognise that this will mean some summer journeys will either be moved to another day, another airport or be cancelled and we apologise to those whose travel plans are affected.   

“The airport will still be busy, as we are trying to get as many people away as possible, and we ask you to bear with us if it takes a little longer to check in, go through security or collect your bag than you are used to at Heathrow.  We ask passengers to help, by making sure they have completed all their COVID requirements online before they come to the airport, by not arriving earlier than 3 hours before their flight, by being ready for security with laptops out of bags and liquids, aerosols and gels in a sealed 100ml plastic bag, and by using e-gates in immigration where eligible. We are all recruiting as fast as we can and aim to return to the excellent service you should expect from the UK’s hub airport as soon as possible.”   

Comments (290)

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

  • Richie says:

    There’s an airport to the east of London with a rail link that’s not very busy at the moment, will an airline grab an opportunity?

    • JamesF300 says:

      Southend could definitely do with some extra flights, and it’s a great little airport by all accounts. Just a shame that the Elizabeth Line didn’t reach further out than Shenfield

      • Richie says:

        BTW It’s a 28 min train journey from Shenfield to Southend Airport.

        • JamesF300 says:

          True, but there’s an element of faff associated with changing trains. When the line is complete, a single train the could connect Southend Airport with Central and West London would be a real boon.

          That said, the trains into London on the Greater Anglia are a lot quicker now that most of the stops between Shenfield and Liverpool Street are cut out

    • SamG says:

      I think Easyjet must have at least spoken to them about moving across a couple of lines of LGW summer sun flying but unless they were willing to commit to the winter why would Southend staff up to handle it? and getting security cleared staff in time also impossible I’d imagine, they must have very few of their own currently

      • Richie says:

        Some SEN staff may not be able to travel to other airports but may be able to do some extra hours at their airport.

  • Andy in Cheshire says:

    I have just had a look at the BA website and they still appear to be selling LHR flights in August.

    I’m some cases, Premium Economy flights are cheaper than Economy Standard, which makes no sense whatsoever (LHR-JFK 15/08/22 11:00)

    Looks like it’s a complete shambles.

    • Rob says:

      I doubt the airlines saw that press release more than 30 minutes before we saw it.

      Logically, BA should keep selling cash tickets – at high prices – and then cancel other flights, or individual passengers, with low value tickets.

      • OP says:

        I.e. Avios redemption passengers, especially those on 2 for 1 bookings…. ?

      • insider says:

        the airlines were warned of this on Sunday evening

        • Rob says:

          I doubt they were told it as a definite fact – it must be on the margin of being something that a quoted airline like IAG would have to disclose to the Stock Exchange to avoid a false market.

  • Harry Holden says:

    How is John Holland-Kaye still in a job? And has anyone seen or heard anything out of Sean Doyle in the past months?

  • Aston100 says:

    Interesting.
    A month ago, Lufthansa cancelled my flight from BHX to BKK.
    There are no alternatives that do not involve huge connection times. Therefore, I’ve been rerouted from LHR.
    If that flight gets cancelled too as a result of this, and Lufthansa are not apparently allowed to rebook from LHR, where does that leave me I wonder?

  • points_worrier says:

    Flights still available on the BA website – when will they pull them if they will?

    • JDB says:

      I doubt it will work like that. They will more likely continue to sell high price tickets and then cull later to stay under the cap. HAL may be able to instruct airlines to cap numbers but it can only suggest they refrain from selling tickets.

      • meta says:

        The longer they wait in removing the flights from sale, the less it becomes extraordinary circumstance with all reasonable measures taken to prevent them. I’d say they are ok for another week or two, but after that you’d probably win an argument that they haven’t taken all reasonable measures. They asked them to cancel now, not a month down the line.

  • Niklas Smith says:

    @Rob: Surely no airline can pick and choose individual passengers to ”cancel” rather than cancelling a flight? (Of course, if they have a flight full of passengers with cheap tickets to Spain that flight would be more likely to be cancelled than a flight full of full-fare business travellers to New York, but that’s not the same as tearing up the tickets of individual passengers without cancelling the flight they are on.)

    Also, a question about Heathrow telling airlines not to rebook passengers – can they do that, since the right to be rebooked in case of cancellation is in UK law?

    • Lady London says:

      Well @Niklas it used to be fairly miraculous that so many passengers who happened to have booked on avios 2+1’s seemed to be chosen disproportionately often to be the ines downgraded on sought-after longhaul flights to places like the Maldives and their seats apparently sold to someone else.

      But miracles can happen, of course.

      • meta says:

        Under UK261, they need to specifically ask for volunteers in case of denied boarding. If no-one comes forward, then they can randomly choose who goes and who doesn’t.

        • JDB says:

          The thing is it won’t happen by denied boarding – that would not comply with the cap on numbers of passengers expected each day.

          • Sussex bantam says:

            Going to be an interesting process though if they pick passengers rather than flights

            “Hi. We’re sorry to tell you but we can’t fly you to XXX. Please contact us for rebooking”

            “I see you’re still selling my original flight. Please rebook me on that”

          • Sussex bantam says:

            Ah. As BentB says below I guess they will just pretend they don’t have a legal obligation to rebook and then most people will just accept the cancellation.

          • meta says:

            We can only speculate. One thing you can be certain is that process won’t be fair and there will be a lot of angry people.

            It could be that people that checked in online will be fine, those who wait for airport check-in are at risk. If you’re traveling in this period, it’s now more than ever important to check in online immediately at 24hrs.

          • Lady London says:

            @SussexBantam that is exactly what they’re going to do.

            Someone in BA has probably also started drafting some generic emails to go out.

            As Rob has hinted, the intelligent reaction of the airlines might be to effectively auction seats to the highest bidder. And I don’t blame them.

            The UK can also suspend UK261 if it wants to

  • Suzy says:

    I can see that AA have stopped selling tickets until 1st August but none of the others appear to have followed suit yet (BA/Virgin/United/Delta/Jetblue etc all still selling long haul tickets for July); should we be worried about a potential cancellation of our LHR-MIA July flight? We were moved from BA to AA when BA canned the early LHR-MIA flight. We accepted the change as AA57 departs at a similar time to our original flight but now I’m worried on several counts including why only AA have stopped selling tickets so far. Dreading the huge queues at T3 given recent reports let alone from today when AA move back there and also the threat of AFS striking for 72 hours over the weekend we should be flying. I have grave doubts that we will make our cruise from Miami and little faith that our luggage will make it so we’ve just bought new carry on’s to see us through for a while. I’ve asked BAH if they will change us back onto the late BA flight but no joy!😥 Do you think AA were just the fastest to react to the announcement?

    • Magic Mike says:

      Looks like aa.com are still selling seats out of LHR for next week…

      • Suzy says:

        Thanks for checking Mike. I only had time to check quickly in work but can now see direct AA flights still for sale through July although still worryingly no direct LHR-MIA flights with AA from 20th July though until 1st August I’m not sure whether that might be in relation to the possibility that AFS might go on strike for 72 hours from 21st July? I just wish BAH would allow us to change back to BA to try to eliminate one potential issue.

        • Suzy says:

          It looks like AA have stopped selling flights on AA metal LHR-USA 20th July to 31st July. Hopefully our flight still goes ahead on 23rd but we’re in the lap of the gods it seems.

          • Cat says:

            Hi Suzy, I’m possibly booked on the same flight as you (10:40am 23rd LHR to MIA? I’m transiting to Costa Rica…), and am keeping my fingers crossed too. My flights are still showing in the app… Fingers crossed.

            Rob/ Rhys – is there any chance of passing on my email address to Suzy and vice versa (if she agrees, of course), so we can keep each other informed quickly, if we find anything out?

  • Bent B says:

    Got two flights cancelled today – rather than being able to rebook on the website/app I am left only with the cancellation/refund option. The app does say you can call in. I guess that’s a tactic to get people to cancel straight away.

This article is closed to new comments. Feel free to ask your question in the HfP forums.

The UK's biggest frequent flyer website uses cookies, which you can block via your browser settings. Continuing implies your consent to this policy. Our privacy policy is here.